Archive for June, 2007

The advantages of using SaaS

Monday, June 25th, 2007

The key advantages of using the SaaS (Software as a Service) model are that: • It provides a low cost of entry to build a business case and gain executive-level buy-in.

• It allows the business to build a Project Portfolio Management (PPM) process and embed competency without being bogged down in protracted software installation cycles.

• It allows the business to work around IT resource and budget constraints.

• The vendor’s application can be tested in a proof-of-concept or pilot.

• The SaaS provider owns, operates and maintains the software application.

• The SaaS provider owns, operates and maintains the servers that run the application.

• The SaaS provider employs the people needed to maintain the application

What is SaaS (Software as a Services)?

Monday, June 18th, 2007

The SaaS (Software as a Services) model levers the developments in Web 2.0 to deliver the same features and functions as desktop programmes, including rich user interfaces and fast feedback via a web-only infrastructure. The current jostling and market competition between the software giants Google and Microsoft is very typical of developments within the SaaS space. Both Google and Microsoft are pioneering the latest developments (Google Office and Microsoft Office Live) to migrate into online, web based environments with the next generation of more dynamic, businessresponsive applications. Compared with the desktop environment, the SaaS model provides many compelling benefits, the most significant being the ability to have truly ‘stateless’ computing. In other words, wherever the user goes their data goes with them. This means there is no need to synchronise data, and the application runs on practically any computer, as long as the operating system supports a standard web browser.

According to IT analysts Gartner, SaaS applications present a costeffective alternative to in-house software licensing options – especially for small to medium sized enterprises. SaaS allows small companies to get ‘good enough’ enterprise application functionality such as a PPM tool, in a model that works for them, leaving the IT skills and capital investment burdens to the service provider.

SaaS offerings allow an organisation to spend more of its software investment money in critical areas, such as services, process definition, and support, as opposed to spending the bulk of the investment money merely on implementing technology. SaaS allows an organisation to focus on automating proven processes in shorter periods of time (compared to in-house deployments), without committing to a longterm (multi-year, multi-phased implementation) relationship with one vendor.

SaaS as a network of web based business services is now becoming widely used within the Project Portfolio Management (PPM) market as a quick, low cost, low risk method of deploying software across the enterprise. In its simplest form SaaS manages and distributes services and solutions to customers across a secure internet connection or a private network from a remote, central data centre. The core feature of SaaS is that users do not need to purchase, install and maintain the software themselves; instead they rent the applications they need from their SaaS provider as part of consultation driven Project Portfolio Management initiative. SaaS providers offer companies services that would otherwise have to be provided in-house, or on site. The need for SaaS has evolved from the increasing costs of specialised software, which have far exceeded the price range of small to medium sized businesses. Also, the growing complexities of software have led to huge costs in distributing the software to end users. In essence, through SaaS, the complexities and costs of such software can be cut down.

Understanding your businesses capability to deliver…?

Friday, June 1st, 2007

Here are three typical key questions about your business:

• Do you have a complete picture of the demands being made on the business?

• Do projects come from nowhere and do you have the capability to deliver on them?

• Are you able to quickly reprioritise resources?

Project driven organisations are often caught in a situation where project resource demands are coming at them from many different directions. Many organisations are simply ill-equipped to deal with these pressures.

Rather than focusing on what is best for the business as a whole, managers are caught in a resource management game of cat and mouse. Many are forced to manage their resources via verbal networking and informal bartering. These informal processes limit the ability to optimise staffing levels, which inevitably leads to lower utilisation rates, skills shortages and lower profitability. Achieving an equitable balance between resource supply and project demand is a significant issue for successful management of the Project Portfolio Management process.

The greatest problem for many is that they rely on home grown manual systems or numerous spreadsheets to
achieve this.

Such systems hamper the business, preventing it from:

• effectively assigning the right resource to the right job

• understanding whether the business has the capability to take on new projects

• ensuring that resources are working to drive the businesses strategic goals

• managing the planning horizon and model multiple resource scenarios

• identifying operational resource bottlenecks

Within all organisations, resource demands will usually exceed supply and there are always too many projects and not enough resources to carry them out well. However, many project selection methods and processes do a poor job of resource balancing because they do not understand the business’s capability to take on new projects. Many organisations simply consider individual projects one at a time and on their own merits, with little regard for the impact that one project has on the next. Worse yet,
people resources are assigned to projects, but only later is it discovered that the same resources are committed to multiple projects, and that the same people are over-allocated. In essence projects are evaluated with no strategic view in mind, ‘go’ decisions are made and resource implications are often not factored in. This cascades down the pipeline. Gridlock ends up plaguing many project portfolio processes simply because they lack visibility of and control over their resources.

For a PPM process to be successful, the organisation needs this visibility of and control over resources in order to ensure that it has the right people on the right jobs at the right time. Effective PPM is about the ability to view resource allocation across all projects, programmes and portfolio and also have the ability to reallocate these resources to more critical activities and to factor this into any forward planning.

In order to better understand your business’s capability, three key components need to be factored into organising for PPM:

• A single integrated resource and skills database: It is essential that the PPM implementation is designed to handle automatic resource allocation, facilitated by an underlying skills database drawn from a
single data source.

• ‘What if’ scenario capability analysis: Advanced scenario modelling provides the ‘what-if’ capabilities to examine multiple scenarios so as to help fine-tune assumptions about projected resource usage, performance and milestones, and is essential to planning and forecasting the future direction of the project portfolio. This allows resource plans to be tested for feasibility, matching against skills, competencies, experience and availability. ‘What if’ scenarios give the portfolio process the ability to match supply and demand and clearly demonstrate to the rest of the business where potential shortfalls exist.

• Dashboard visibility of resources: PPM needs to deliver dynamic visibility by aligning resources with organisational capacities. Dashboard visibility, as outlined earlier, enables the business to drill down and drill up though capability management data by allowing all relevant roles and layers of management to efficiently measure and monitor in real time the business’s internal and external resources demands. Dashboard visibility allows you to receive automatic notifications on
work slippage, capacity issues, and other concerns while extending