Archive for the ‘Project Portfolio Management’ Category

Challenging the Project-Centric Approach

Friday, February 2nd, 2007

Let me start by quoting Harvey Levine. “Where Six Sigma propelled us closer to zero defects. The PPM process will move us closer to zero project failure.”

The project centric approach has been around since the dawn on project management and is inherently flawed. Why? Typically in project centric environments, organisation tend to focus on individual project choices, made one at a time with little regard for the impact that one project has on the next. Moreover, project-centric tools and processes typically have the reputation of being in the domain of the project manager, not that of the business, divorced from the executive decision making stream.

The result is poor quality project information and an imbalanced portfolio which leads to project-by-project decision making. In other words, the business suffers from too many projects that have a bias toward the short term, which are relatively low in value and carry minimal risk. When riskier projects are put onto the agenda, management does not have the necessary visibility of the business’s capability and is not prepared to initiate the project. Most importantly, a project-centric approach is unable to roll milestones up and down the organisation in order to give a business view of what is
and what is not being delivered.

I argue in my new book Project Portfolio Management: Leading the Coprorate Vision the following. “PPM challenges the narrow ‘pure play, project-by-project orientated focus to planning’ and draws attention to the broader, more integrated approach, which subjects projects to wider organisational considerations and executive responsibility.

Simply put, PPM looks to empower the business, not just the project process. It helps the business establish a clear line of sight from the top-level pan-initiative view right down to the individual project layer. From the strategic viewpoint, it allows stakeholders, business leaders and executives to see clearly and understand how effective their strategies are and if necessary which programmes and projects to review. From the operational viewpoint, PPM empowers programme, resource and project managers with tools, support and necessary corporate accountability to execute project delivery.

The management of the project portfolio so as to maximise the contribution of projects to the overall welfare and success of the enterprise. Project Portfolio Management (PPM) is the management of that collection of projects and programmes in which a company invests to implement its strategy, for example asset programmes, improvement initiatives and strategic change work streams among others. A PPM process can utilise various techniques to provide tangible results for your business, ensuring that project investments contribute directly to realising your corporate goals.”
Let me finish where I started by quoting Harvey Levine. He states that” The emergence of PPM as a recognized set of practices may be considered the biggest leap in project management technology since the development of Program Evaluation and Review Technique and Critical Path Method in the late 50s”

Why Implement PPM?

Thursday, February 1st, 2007

Part 2 of 4: Excerpts from the forthcoming PPM bookProject Portfolio Management: Leading The Coporate Vision by Shan Rajegopal, Philip McGuin and James Waller

Is there a business today, no matter how large or small, that can afford to invest in non-performing or non-strategic projects? The importance of investing in the right projects, the need for compliance and the urgent demand for new product and service development all provide reasons why businesses depend on their project management processes to deliver and optimise results.It is a fact that businesses operate in a complex environment with many programmes and projects going on at any one time. Project Portfolio Management is today seen as an essential prerequisite not only for driving and improving project performance, but also for ensuring the business’s success. The reality is that in all organisations decision making is not an easy task for the executive team. Making ‘effective’ and ‘efficient’ decisions about a project, based on rational, accurate and real-time data, can be virtually impossible. For example – projects are often arbitrarily assessed only against the bottom-line financial impact instead of being evaluated according to their health, cost and strategic contribution to the organisation over the short and long term

Essentially many businesses lack the day-to-day tools and processes needed to facilitate the discussion and resolution of difficult project decisions. They lack the standardised processes which help project stakeholders throughout the organisation understand how and why certain decisions are being made and also enable the business to ferret out socalled ‘pet projects’ that do not contribute to strategic objectives. Even when organisations embark upon developing a formal framework for aligning their projects with the business process it is still fraught with roadblocks. Many organisations are still daunted by the perceived capital and cultural investment needed to deploy PPM, and many organisations still ask whether they need such a process to manage their business projects and whether the cultural and technical impact is palatable.

PPM enables the business to align resources and project investments with corporate objectives. PPM provides a structured environment for deciding which projects, programmes and initiatives to fund, to sustain and to eliminate. PPM is about optimising the investment in change initiatives and subordinating programme and project approval to business strategy rather than departmental and business unit objectives. PPM ensures you are running the right programmes and brings discipline to the project muddle and resource contention that are so common in large organisations. PPM is the management of a portfolio so as to maximise the contribution of projects to the overall welfare and success of the enterprise.

For business leaders and executives this means that:

* Projects should contribute to a positive cash flow for the enterprise.
* Projects must effectively utilise the organisation’s resources.
* Projects must help position the organisation for future success and growth.

The PPM process enables business users to organise a series of projects into an integrated portfolio. As part of this process the business is able to produce reports based on the various project objectives, costs, resources and risks. This will assist the business in making key financial and business decisions. PPM is a dynamic process whereby projects are regularly evaluated, prioritised and selected, based on the goal of obtaining the greatest possible value from the organisation’s limited resources.

* Authors: Shan Rajegopal, Philip McGuin and James Waller
* ISBN: 0230507166
* Format: Trade Book
* Price: £25.00
* Pub. Date: 15/03/2007
* Publisher(s): Palgrave Macmillan

To pre-order you copy click here

Project Manager Today Software Review

Tuesday, January 23rd, 2007

Atlantic Globals’s Corporate Vision began its life when its developer discovered that his business was losing one and a half day’s billable income for each employee per month, because it wasn’t being recoreded. He developed a timesheet system to gather up this missed time and it’s that system that’s evolved into Corporate Vision.

They pursue a business-oriented approach to project mangement, providing, in their software, the means to measure the expenditure of money and resources and the production of deliverables and benefits. The system must ‘wrap around’ the dynamics of the organisation and, to help them achive this, they work with ‘development partners’; their current major development partner is Norwich Union.

Each Corporate Vision installation is tailored to the client’s specific requirements – their business dynamics and procedures are analysed to that the system can be configured to support their existing infrastructure.

All About OPM3

Friday, January 19th, 2007

PMI’s Organization Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3) is not without controversy, and things are heating up more than ever. Some tout it’s ability to help organizations navigate a growth path and others claim it’s too focused on academia and doesn’t hit on real world issues facing project managers.

Click here to read recent articles from the PM Think website that show the good and the bad of the OPM3.

Project Roles and Responsibilities

Tuesday, January 9th, 2007

The Project Steps web blog has a good overview of the roles and responsibilities within a typical project team. For your convenience, we have listed these roles below.

However one role is missing – the role of the Project Portfolio Manager.

Project Portfolio Manager is responsible for spearheading PPM within the business and has one of the most important roles within the Project Portfolio Management Team (PPMT) alongside the executive sponsor. This person is focused on leading the management team behind PPM and has overall responsibility for managing delivery of the portfolio process and communicating its performance to both the businesses strategic and operational functions. Project Portfolio Manager is responsible for guiding and updating the value judgments and policy decisions needed to guide the team. In additon the Project Portfolio Manager should have the ability to influence decisions to suspend, at any time, further commitment of investment monies due to failure to make anticipated progress, changing economic climates or shifts in business objectives.

Roles and Responsibilities

1. Executive Steering Committee: Sets the strategic vision and objectives for a given program or project. The team leads efforts to build consensus through the organization to support the project or program’s objectives.

2. Governance Board: Formal team of executives from across the organization that ensure projects will meet/are meeting enterprise goals.

3. Project Sponsor: Provides clarity of the project vision, and directs the activities of the project team. Allocates funding and resources to the project. Provides executive authority necessary to overcome organizational obstacles and barriers. The guardian of the business case, and ultimately responsible for project success.

4. Performing Organization: The organization whose personnel are most directly involved in doing the work of the project. This organization usually provides sponsorship for the project.

5. Project Management Office: An organizational body or entity assigned various responsibilities related to the centralized and coordinated management of those programs/projects under its domain.

6. Project Stakeholders: Persons or organizations (customers, sponsors, performers, public) that are actively involved in the project or whose interests may be positively or negatively impacted by executing or implementation of the project.

7. Program Manager: Person responsible for the centralized, coordinated management of a program (group of related projects) to achieve the program’s strategic objectives and benefits.

8. Project Manager: The person assigned by the performing organization to achieve the project objectives. The project manager is responsible for coordinating and integrating activities across multiple functional lines, and managing stakeholder communications. The project manager accomplishes the above by managing project scope, time, cost, and quality. Finally, the project manager applies project management, general management and technical skills, as well as team management, negotiation, financial and business acumen, combined with an understanding of organizational politics to meet project objectives and to meet or exceed stakeholder expectations.

9. Project Team: All the project team members, including the project management team, the project manager, and for some projects, the project sponsor.

10. Functional Manager: On projects, the person responsible for ensuring agreed-upon project tasks are completed using pre-defined resources under the manager’s control within scope, time, budget and quality constraints.

11. Project Team Leader: Responsible for ensuring that agreed-upon project tasks and assignments are completed on time, on budget, and within quality standards for personnel under their realm of control or influence. The team leader should be knowledgeable of the principles and practices of project management and understand the business unit’s strategic and operational issues.

12. Technical Manager/Liaison: Responsible for the technical implementation of the project as measured against the project requirements, quality targets, and budgetary constraints, and timelines. Ensures technical deliverables are consistent with the overall technical strategy of the enterprise.

13. Business Analyst: Primary interface between projects and business partners. Responsible for understanding current and future processes, including processes for the entire enterprise. Documents business requirements, generate business cases, assists in defining project benefits/ costs, and participates in project reviews
To view the Project Steps posting click here